Lauren Embree vs Shelby Talcott Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L L
Form
W W L W L W L W L LH2H: Embree 1 - 0 Talcott
They have played 2 sets in total, with Embree winning 2 and Talcott winning 0. The last match between Embree and Talcott was at the Naples, 10-05-2017, First, Clay with Lauren Embree getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lauren Embree | 1 |
| Shelby Talcott | 0 |
Naples(10-05-2017)
6
0
6
3
| Embree | Stats | Talcott |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 232 | Highest Rank | 574 |
| 34 | Age | 32 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 62% (165-100) | Career Total W/L | 48% (116-127) |
| $11,125 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Lauren Embree
Player
Shelby Talcott
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:2:0 | Average Match Time | 1:2:0 |
| 81% (35/43) | 1st Serve % | 57% (24/42) |
| 71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 50% (4/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (4/18) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 64% (27/42) | Return Points Win % | 33% (14/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lauren Embree Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Di Lorenzo
Player
Lauren Embree
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Lauren Embree
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Embree
Player
Alexa Graham
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Lauren Embree
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lauren Embree
Player
Ashley Kratzer
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lauren Embree
Player
Michaela Gordon
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Embree
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Lauren Embree
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Embree
Player
Shelby Talcott
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shelby Talcott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Romeo
Player
Shelby Talcott
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Shelby Talcott
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Talcott
Player
Bojana Marinkovic
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Shelby Talcott
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Talcott
Player
Sasha Hill
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Shelby Talcott
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shelby Talcott
Player
Haley Giavara
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
56
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 1-6 10-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (165/100) | Win/Loss | 48% (116/127) |
| 59% (360/248) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (260/281) |
| 54% (2871/2415) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2293/2316) |
| 59% (94/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (74/76) |
| 67% (71/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (41/46) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 152 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 208 | Total Double Faults | 497 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 605.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.52 |
| 71% (2891/4079) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4755/7963) |
| 55% (1580/2891) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (2729/4755) |
| 41% (487/1188) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1333/3208) |
| 50% (288/573) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (468/1008) |
| 48% (1991/4111) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3705/8148) |
| 33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (119/80) | Challenger W/L | 41% (34/48) |
| 75% (44/15) | Futures W/L | 51% (82/79) |
| 61% (159/259) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (114/240) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (23/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (16/33) |
| 58% (44/76) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (27/56) |
| 87% (151/132) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (123/105) |
| 12% (151/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (123/18) |
| 28% (114/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (120/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
